TO JUDGE AND NOT LEGISLTATE
Posted by B. Preston
JunkYardBlog
A. M. Siriano comes up with the most positive assessment of the Miers nomination yet:
The greatest weapon that President Bush has is liberals'
unquestioning belief in his abject stupidity, which has
helped him in the effort to undo years of leftist
subversion of America, which includes the spread of what
we now call "legislating from the bench." Every other day
Bush stands in front of liberals and sends them the same
powerful right hook, and every day they look left. So let
the beaten decide: Either President Bush is among the
shrewdest politicians in history, or it is the liberals
who are the stupid ones.
So why was this morning's nomination of Harriet Miers so
brilliant? Because for the second time, Bush chose not a
rightist per se, but a Constitutional constructionist
(which is to say, a rightist).
---
What our extremely intelligent President is doing is
trying to recreate a Supreme Court that, in the context
of its role, has no interest in politics, but only in
judging. Go for it, libs! It's a novel idea that some
other smart guys—far superior in intelligence than any of
our modern politicians—conjured up over 200 years ago.
The truth is, both Scalia and Thomas are not that much
further right than Roberts or Miers (though some would
not agree), and I'm not sure it's all that important,
anyway. What is important is that they all share a common
goal, which is to judge and not legislate.
I hope he's right. If he is, the Miers nomination will go down as among the shrewdest in US history.
I can't say I'm convinced, but Tony is a smart guy who sees things clearly when everyone else is in a stampede.
junkyardblog.net
amsiriano.com