SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (22571)10/5/2005 8:38:23 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) of 28931
 
<I have quoted thousands of biblical contradictions and I have quoted examples of the most brutal and savage and primitive behaviours imaginable. >

Remember that what is contained in the bible was decided by humans, not god {whatever that is}. The old testiment was included in 'Christian' teachings despite having nothing to do with Jesus, and therefore arguably don't really belong with the 'New Testiment'. These types of decisions were probably all political and whatever.

In any case, stick to the New Testiment and the teachings reportedly directly credited to Jesus himself. You can easily note how virtually every nutcase Elmer Gantry on TV spews old Testiment 'eye for an eye' stuff all based on a vaggue statement by Jesus that he wasn't trying to replace the old scriptures, but to clarify them {or some such talk}. He also in several places directly contradicted some old Testiment teachings.

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext