Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Road Walker who wrote (253888)	10/6/2005 3:53:59 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (3) of 1576130

Look at it this way. Yogoslavia was an authoritarian dictatorship since WW2 until about 1990. Then in the break down of authoritarian rule some of those countries wound up in major civil wars which resulted in the Bosnia-Serbia problems of the 1990s. The region is still coming to terms with their ethnic rivalries, and not yet 100% peaceful. But the region has some semblance of democracy and the opportunity in the future to get the economic benefits of the EU and be a "normal" player in world affairs with all the benefits that that brings. So, do you think it would have been better if Yugoslavia had not been allowed to split into its various countries, a strong man remained in charge, the wars of the 1990s never occurred (the strong man just did some major repression of the populace) and Yugoslavia was still one nation under a Gaddafi-type strong man? Or was it worth it, and despite the Bosnian-Serbian wars/genocide, the people of Yugoslavia (at least those that remain) are better off that they theoretically would have been if their authoritarian government in 1989 just cracked down on the various separitist movements?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next