As embarrassed as I may be if I am wrong, and I find that there was no reporting from Iraq on or about 9/11, just as I believe I remember it (which wouldn't be ignorance, it would be simply mistaken), you ought to be incredibly embarrassed for your complete lack of understanding of basic truth and logic, as demonstrated in your post. You see, that goes to the core of your whole thought process. I may be wrong (but still think my memory serves correctly, thank-you), but you truly show yourself to be so lacking in basic logic and judgement, that you should realize by now you probably need to take a major step back and re-think everything you think you know.
In this light, your claim that "ignorance" is heinous is, if not bad judgement, certainly inapplicable here. Given your view of the logic of truth and lying, it is likely you'll be incapable of understanding this.
I'll tell you what...I've got plenty of reasons for believing war on Saddam and now Al Qaeda in Iraq was and is necessary. You've got no excuse save "ignorance" or purposeful intent to deceive (take your pick), for your black logic and frankly, persistent falsehoods when representing my statements here.
Dan B. |