Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92721)	10/8/2005 9:09:15 PM
From: Lee Webb	Read Replies (2) of 122087

Jeff: Thanks. The question of why would not have occurred to me because I thought that the sentencing date had probably been rescheduled and thought I knew why. On Sept. 20 Barry Berke requested a 60-day extension -- from Sept. 23 to Nov. 22 -- to file a sentencing memorandum on behalf of Anthony Elgindy. He also asked for two weeks from the date of the prosecution's sentencing submission to file a reply. His reasons and arguments in support of the request seemed persuasive to me. Among other things, he noted that while the rules of procedure require that a defendant receive the presentence report (PSR) at least 35 days before sentencing, he had not received the 52-page report until Sept. 16. He went on to argue that "the numerous and complex issues presented by the PSR" and "the enormous amount of work that must be done to fully and vigorously respond to the extraordinarily harsh and unexpected advisory Guidelines calculation" justified the requested extension. My perhaps obvious question now is, who told you the specifics of the "why" are confidential? Lee lwebb@stockwatch.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next