" We have documents found after the fact and we have the report of an ABC reporter to that effect from 1994"
Do you have these documents, or is it the mouse in your pocket that has them? Have you seen the documents, or did you just read "reports" of them? I'm sure you've read some other "reports" that didn't turn out to be true, so I would think you (and the mouse in your pocket) might be able to understand why I am cautious.
And you've GOT to be kidding. Do you know how much money it is "reported" that was funneled to terrorist organizations by Saudi Arabia? You can check that out on the net, if you're interested. Do you know how many terrorists had a nexus with Saudi Arabia? Now, let's move on to Pakistan... and how about Syria? I realize these are all just "reports" but you seem to believe those kinds of things, or maybe only when they work for you, and not against you. I am ROFL at you.
And I don't oppose military action, and it's very silly of you to ASSume that when I've never said anything of the kind (and in fact said the reverse, over and over and over- that doesn't speak very highly for your powers of observation, or literacy). I've said many times (and I think at least once to you) that I supported Desert Storm because a country was INVADED. I support the right of states to sovereignty, and so an invasion warrants military assistance. But you, you need to ASSume I don't favor military assistance because you need to believe something else that is patently untrue. You really are a waste of time to read. And you think I should be ashamed. Well let me tell you, I'm ashamed for you almost every time I read your posts- and especially ashamed for you that you need to fabricate things about other posters. That is really pathetic. |
