SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Peter Dierks10/12/2005 12:40:53 AM
   of 90947
 
Federal Government to Prosecute Teamsters Union for Illegally Fining Workers After Grocery Strike
Union officials illegally ordered non-striking workers to pay over $120,000 in fines after misinforming employees that formal union membership was a job requirement

Los Angeles, California (October 7, 2005) - The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has agreed to prosecute Teamsters Union Local 952 for violating the rights of, and illegally imposing fines as high as $13,000 on, over 70 grocery workers who refused to abandon their jobs during a Teamsters union “sympathy strike.” The contentious union strike ordered by United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) and Teamsters union officials shut down grocery stores across California in 2003.

In early 2004, three workers assisted by National Right to Work Foundation attorneys filed NLRB unfair labor practice charges against the union. Those charges were the basis for over 70 similar complaints from employees of Albertson’s and Ralphs Grocery locations in Irvine, Brea and La Habra, California. The NLRB combined all the complaints into one case and scheduled a January 2006 hearing on the charges.

The 132-page consolidated complaint describes how Teamsters union officials failed to properly inform the employees of their rights to refrain from formal union membership, making each employee’s union membership involuntarily and coerced. This failure to inform workers of their rights means that the over $120,000 in retaliatory fines union officials levied against the workers were unlawful.

Teamsters union officials initiated internal union “discipline” and fined over 70 workers anywhere from $200 to $13,000 dollars because the workers continued to do their jobs after Teamsters union officials ordered a sympathy strike on behalf of the UFCW union. The amounts of other fines were not disclosed.

The original charges filed by the employees also alleged that the “sympathy strike” Teamsters officials ordered was unlawful because it was in violation of the union’s own “no-strike” contract. Ultimately, the NLRB complaint only deals with the fact that by misinforming workers that formal union membership was a condition of employment, the punitive fines imposed by the union hierarchy were illegitimate because the workers were not voluntarily union members.

“Teamsters union officials engaged in an ugly and unlawful campaign of retaliation that trampled the rights of rank-and-file workers who refused to walk off the job and continued working to support their families,” said Stefan Gleason, Vice President of the Foundation.

Under the Foundation-won Supreme Court decision in Communications Workers v. Beck and subsequent NLRB rulings, union officials cannot require formal union membership or the payment of union dues unrelated to collective bargaining as a condition of employment. Employees are also entitled to notice of their right to refrain from union membership, an independent audit of union expenditures and notice of their right to object to paying for non-bargaining activity.

The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation is a nonprofit, charitable organization providing free legal aid to employees whose human or civil rights have been violated by compulsory unionism abuses. The Foundation, which can be contacted toll-free at 1-800-336-3600, is assisting thousands of employees in close to 300 cases nationwide.

nrtw.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext