SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (255135)10/13/2005 12:11:40 PM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) of 1572715
 
Yes, teachers who earn tenure should get it. That is common in all educational organizations.

Being common doesn't mean its a good idea. I think it's a bad idea. I'd rather have 5%-10% of teachers removed each year, or at least have some method of getting rid of the bad ones.

Teachers don't get paid very much so they get more job security than most.

Plenty of jobs pay less than teachers and have less job security, so that doesn't add up.

If you don't want to offer tenure, you have to pay them better. Or you won't attract good teachers from the private sector.

I think there is a large supply of teachers because people think its a fun job. That's one reason the pay is low (supply-demand). However, I would have no problem with increasing teachers pay and also making it a lot harder for them to get and hold those high paying jobs. Maybe some type of pyramid structure similar to what we have in law firms (if you don't get promoted to the high paying teacher's position in X years, you're out the door).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext