SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KLP who wrote (142860)10/14/2005 11:30:46 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (4) of 793912
 
You aren't saying that only monied people should be on the Supreme Court, are you?

I'm sure it was different when the current crop of Justices were in law school, but today anyone can afford to go to a top law school. Banks will lend law students all the money they want, up to the cost of attendance. It's a pretty safe investment. If you go to Yale, you're practically guaranteed a $120k first year paycheck.

In the old days, schools operated on the attrition model - take in qualified candidates, with the expectation that the less than cream will drop out. Today, the schools take smaller classes but highest standards. If you get into Yale law school, you're brilliant. If you go to Yale, get good grades, edit the law review, clerk with a federal judge, etc - you're not just brilliant, you're damn brilliant. Those are the people you want on the Supreme Court, IMO. The law is a scholarly profession, and you want the best on our de facto constitutional court. There are brilliant folks at "lesser" schools, but you have to be brilliant to get into a top school, you have to be brilliant to rought it out and excel, and those are objective hiring criteria everyone can agree on.

Derek
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext