SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stevefoder who wrote (142937)10/14/2005 2:05:22 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) of 793911
 
better math students"

I don't know what Bill's reply will be, but the present members of the Supremes are from top law schools. That means they would have got LSATs of about 170. You don't get a 170 unless you got a SAT of over 1200. Which means you got a very high math score.

Miers went the SMU/SMU route for undergrad and Law. She would not have needed those kind of scores to qualify there. And there is nothing in her BG that would lead me to think she had those high scores. Speculation? Yes. But I think grounded in reality.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News