Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: geode00 who wrote (172269)	10/15/2005 4:33:32 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I hardly call it "progressive" to propose plunging a country of 20 million people into utter chaos and violent anarchy. we ignored and still ignore the massive corruption and cronyism of this war and now.... I thought that John Locke was the progressive.. What you're descibing sounds pretty Hobbsian to me.. It's time for the rightwing of this country to stand up and take responsibility for this war and all of its outcomes from the first lie to the end. And of course, Clinton bears NO responsibility for his lack of "assertiveness" with regard to Saddam's deliberate violation of the UN cease fire that ended Desert Storm? And how about the UNSC? They voted quite overwhelmingly in support of UNSC 1441, which declared Iraq in "Material Breach" of those cease fire conditions. Do they bear any responsibility for the lies they purveyed? Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next