Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: geode00 who wrote (172572)	10/17/2005 6:38:49 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) of 281500

1) Lots of very rational people do as evidenced by the absence of terror attacks (promised by the terrorists) in the last three years. 2) You asked where the 911 attacks were planned and coordinated from - I told you. 3) In what significant way is British policy on Afghanistan different from ours? They're members of NATO and have troops in Afghanistan currently as we do. 4) Yes, the idea is islamo-fascism. 5)"Libya had in principle agreed to surrender its programs in 1999." But they did nothing in that regard till after Saddam was pulled out of sewerhole. Then Kaddafi let American inspectors enter his country and take his WMD materials to Oak Ridge TN for destruction. 6) This just goes to show that "rightwing" for you is nothing more than a meaningless name to call people. 8) So did Clinton - he just didn't have the guts to go through with it. "Saddam had NO WEAPONS TO GIVE UP." Why couldn't he account for the weapons he once had? If he had, sanctions would have been lifted and he'd have been free to rebuild his military and reinvade Kuwait and SA.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next