SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CommanderCricket who wrote (51973)10/21/2005 8:16:53 AM
From: whitepine  Read Replies (1) of 206203
 
CC,

I was trying to define a bottom price beyond which these stocks would not decline. So if CHK has a PE of 17, is it likely to fall, worse case, to 4 -- 11 -- or some other number?

Let us assume it falls to a PE of 8+. This implies CHK could fall another 50%.

I asked because I was curious how low esteemed members of the board thought stocks could fall, worse case. It is just another way for assessing downside risk. I've never heard this parameter discussed in this way, but to my simple mind, it seems like a way to project relative risk.

wp
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News