Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 179.02

+3.7%

Nov 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: engineer who wrote (47939)	10/21/2005 12:01:03 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) of 196502

Tero, 1998: I don't think the prospects of a company that has 1% global [handset] market share are very good in the future, either. Message 4577562 Tero on Q's licensing structure, 1998: Everybody is free to interpret this in the way they choose. I don't see extravagant demands of 5% royalties as sound business policy. I think there is a good chance that it will lead to use of alternative technology and zero profits for Qualcomm. Or perhaps Qualcomm will be forced to accept a more reasonable cut. Message 3471902 There's more, lots more, but what's the point? Tero was simply an interested and objective guy, totally lacking in any ulterior motives, right?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next