SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis
SOXX 351.50-2.4%Feb 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (26231)10/22/2005 11:34:33 AM
From: Return to Sender  Read Replies (2) of 95931
 
TechWeek: Worrying Wins Out

By Bill Snyder
TheStreet.com Staff Reporter
10/22/2005 9:00 AM EDT
Click here for more stories by Bill Snyder

thestreet.com

Does Wall Street need a Xanax? Judging by this week's choppy trading you would think that the third-quarter earnings season was off to a terrible start. But it wasn't, of course.

With 160 of the S&P 500 reporting, 110 of them beat earnings expectations, 25 missed and 25 were in line. The positive bias in tech stocks was even stronger: 20 beat, five were in line and just one -- Intel (INTC:Nasdaq - commentary - research - Cramer's Take) (more about that later) -- missed.

"The market isn't translating this into stronger gains; it's a disconnect," says First Call analyst David Dropsey. "Investors keep changing their minds about what to worry about."

And worry they are. Consider the list of concerns tossed off by an investor who manages a small-company oriented growth fund: "The yield curve is flattening, consumers are tapped out, rates are still going up, and Bush may not be able to lower taxes," he fretted. "The consumer sees the value of his house going down and the price of gas and heating oil going up. It's not a good combination."

On the other hand, the strong bottom-line performance of tech issues belied top-line misses that could weaken the traditional end-of-year rally.

Case in point -- IBM (IBM:NYSE - commentary - research - Cramer's Take). Big Blue zipped past earnings expectations by 13 cents a share -- but sales fell short of the $21.71 billion that Wall Street targeted by more than $100 million. Excluding 2004 revenue from IBM's PC business, which the company sold May 1, third-quarter revenue increased a modest 4% from the same period a year ago.

Looked at on a four-quarter rolling basis, growth in each of the last two quarters was 1.4% and 0.48%, says analyst Richard Williams of Garban Institutional Equities.

Of particular concern, he said, was the slowdown in global services revenue on a four-quarter basis, which fell to 0.62% in the third quarter, "the first time this metric has been below 1% growth in more than six periods. Considering the high-margin nature of this source of revenue we wonder how well IBM's earnings can maintain going forward if this trend persists," he wrote in a note to clients.

Then there's Intel. The world's largest chipmaker has the unhappy distinction of being the only tech company in the S&P so far to post a bottom-line miss in the quarter. It's worth noting, however, that it was precipitated by a two-cent charge stemming from the settlement of a long-running patent dispute with MicroUnity, a tiny Silicon Valley chipmaker. Without the charge, Intel would apparently have beaten by a penny.

Intel, by the way, has been complaining all week that it wasn't fair to characterize the miss as such because the charge was not included in the company's guidance or First Call estimates.

The point is arguable, but as it happens the market's sour reaction to Intel's quarter was really keyed to light sales guidance (off by about $100 million) for the fourth quarter; as well as a bevy of secular worries, including interest rates and the overall health of the economy, said Sunil Reddy, a senior portfolio manager with Fifth Third Asset Management.

So, is the economy really that bad, or are investors losing more sleep than they should?

Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of the Economic Cycle Research Institute, looks at the Long Leading Index, essentially a basket of key indicators, as well as the shorter-term Weekly Leading Index. There are real concerns, he says, but the chances of a recession in the next few quarters are low.

Achuthan predicted that the economic fallout from Hurricane Katrina would not be prolonged and he says the latest weekly leading indicators, now at a five-week high, bear that out.

He notes that consumer confidence has been weakening, but says companies are still bringing healthy balance sheets and hefty cash balances to the table. "Corporate spending is a good backstop to consumers."

Inflation, though, is a serious concern. "We have to take the Fed seriously. The inflation cycle is intact and I don't see a peak." And that, says Achuthan, means the Fed will continue to raise interests rates for some time, much to the displeasure of Wall Street.

And if that makes you nervous, take a Xanax.

Dumb Enough

Not to intrude on the Five Dumbest Things on Wall Street, but there was more than enough dumbness to go around this week.
Oracle (ORCL:Nasdaq - commentary - research - Cramer's Take) stands out for needlessly throwing a scare into Wall Street when it postponed its annual meeting with analysts just days before the event.

The postponement sparked rumors that a leading Oracle executive had fallen ill, or that the company, which has been on a multibillion-dollar acquisition spree, was working on yet another mega-deal. There was even a short-lived selloff in the stock.

In truth, the postponement appears to be nothing more than a scheduling foul-up. And Oracle quickly moved to mollify analysts who had already made nonrefundable plane reservations by agreeing to hold a two-hour lunch on Monday with Co-President Charles Phillips.

"Oracle can't seem to maintain a decent relationship with Wall Street," fumed one aggravated sell-side analyst.

And how about those clever folks at SAP (SAP:NYSE ADR - commentary - research - Cramer's Take)? Even people close to the company (when talked to in private, that is) say they can't figure out why the giant German software company is so reluctant to give financial results in dollars as well as euros.

The company's third quarter was more than solid, but the nearly impossible task of quickly and accurately converting euros and shares to dollars and ADRs resulted in more than one discrepancy in analysts' reports.

You'd think a company that posted sales of 2.01 billion euros (make that $2.4 billion) could afford to hire a couple of temps to do the currency translation in a timely fashion.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TechWeek Scorecard

Index Closing Change
Nasdaq Composite 2082 0.8%
Philadelphia Semiconductor 442 -0.2%
Goldman Sachs Software 164 1.2%
TSC Internet 201 1.5%
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext