SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 389.75+0.5%Dec 1 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: freechina who wrote (1498)10/24/2005 1:20:20 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) of 218132
 
Frank, You are absolutely right, Buffett is not altruistic, but a selfish twit, because he does not give all right now; Gates is a scoundrel, because he keeps some for self, so that he can not cease to keep thousands of employees in gravy; and Turner, the worst of the lot, he only listened to his gracious wife, and would have done naught had he been left on own. All terrible people, starting from a particular premise.

As to Soros, a dangerous man, surely, giving 10 big ones to save the world from Mr Mission Accomplished Not. Must be investigated, and better still, hounded into oblivion.

So, in any case, proportionally speaking, I guess I gave more, but since not all, then not altruistic, a scoundrel, and even worse than the worst of the lot, given that I gave less.

I guess I must be misunderstanding you, or do you actually really mean that the gents you mentioned are not altruistic.

Chugs, J
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext