SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (11798)10/24/2005 5:22:05 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
The point is that these firemen are very normal people who say they saw flashes of detonations on the bottom floors just before the building collapsed. I don't understand the physics of demolishing a building that tall but I have read that the basement was full of pools of once molten metal that could not have been melted by the collapse of the building alone. Something had to melt that steel and it was not the fire 100 floors above it or the collapse itself. Detonations of great magnitude did it IMO. To come down the way it did it seems logical in a controlled demolition that it would happen just like we see it did. The top floor section that was toppling over to begin with should have fallen in one piece to the bottom and the rest of the building remain standing. But instead the top piece disintegrated before it ever fell off the building. It started to roll then disappeared. How? And the rest of the building disintegrated. How? If the floors had "pancaked" the structural steel would have remained standing because the floors would have just broken away and left the steel there. It was too strong to be pulled down. The whole official explanation is a joke on us.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext