SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.20+0.1%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: matt dillabough who wrote (182459)10/25/2005 2:40:53 PM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
AMD doesn't have anything in its lineup that measures up with Intel on the higher-end so there was no need to have a zillion different versions at the high-end when Intel accurately anticipated an economic slow-down, but of course, leave it to only the WSJ to put a negative spin on anything related to Intel - it's like a Rovism: WSJ states the opposite of what's true.

WSJ doesn't understand basic 101 Product-Line Economics, where you:

1. Expand lower-end product lines, when entering recessions.

2. Reduce # of (or delay) releases of higher-end product lines, until an economic slow-down ends.

Rather than complimenting Intel on accurately adjusting its product-line for the much anticipated economic slow-down, WSJ punches a cheap Rovism - only the clueless in hightech would follow WSJ.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News