SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ChinuSFO who wrote (68745)10/25/2005 2:48:38 PM
From: Dan B.Read Replies (2) of 81568
 
Yes, Honest American Female Citizens. They spoke the truth. There was never anything convoluted about a woman telling the truth on Clinton, was there? Nor is it convoluted to call them honest, if in fact they did sleep with the guy. I for one don't consider to claim Clinton is a bad guy for relentlessly seeking adultrous affairs (he might get nothing at home for all I know). NO, I say he's a bad guy for lying about the honest female citizens who told the truth. If you wish to call them whores, then what shall you call Clinton? Oh, yeah, a nice guy doing a good job having a little fun. Fine, if you'd cease thinking of them as "whores."

This is just the trouble with YOUR convoluted thinking (which I might add, ignores basic american freedoms of honest speech, as did Clinton just to be sure he could be elected). You seem to think that because these women slept with a married man (certainly at his prompting, in most cases), they are "whores" and therefore it's OK if the president calls them liars when he knew they were not.

There is nothing convoluted about calling such women as slept with Clinton ("whores" or not, thank-you) honest about it, when in fact they were.

That you bring up the word "whore" here, IMO, just reveals the stone-age anti-woman, anti-freedom crap that lives on in the core of your beliefs in general.

How disgusting of you, frankly. Where the hell do you get off, anyway? Warning: Ad Hominen ahead: In Pocket Pussies?

When it comes to Cheney, I see you put words into my mouth which I didn't say. Who said "he could in no way have manipulated?" Not me. I've said there is no evidence that he did so. Who assured you he told the truth? Not me, I just say there is no evidence that he lied, and plenty of evidence that what he believed (if he doesn't still), was believed by many including French Intelligence and even the likes of John Kerry.

It will always be absurd to claim Bush/Cheney as a source of lies over WMD's until you have some evidence showing that they knew better than the rest of the world (bill Clinton included), and went along with the common wisdom anyway. You aren't going to find that, IMHO. And you are never going to look like someone who makes sense when you claim Bush and Cheney lied about WMD's, until you do.

Dan B.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext