SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Alternative energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rock_nj who wrote (2328)10/28/2005 1:59:43 AM
From: Gulo  Read Replies (1) of 16955
 
It sounds like a scam to me.

"elevation difference of 3,700 feet, separated by 105 miles, they found the pressure difference to be in the range of 0.5 to 0.7 psi (pounds per square inch) on a daily basis, never going below 0.5 psi

You'd expect more than 0.5 PSI pressure difference due to the weight of the 3,700 foot tall air column. Air pressure decreases with altitude. There is no energy to be gained there.

That, and the fact that a 0.5 PSI pressure drop across a few hundred miles isn't even enough to generate high wind speeds in the open atmosphere. It would never be able to do it in a confined pipe. Someone can calculate it if they want, but I wouldn't bother with these guys.
-g
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext