Moderate Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (20130)	10/28/2005 10:45:55 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) of 20773

Another comment on the Quartering Act... England spent a hell of a lot of money defending the colonies and went into debt as a result. The Crown tried various methods, e.g., the Stamp Act, to get the colonies to pay at least some portion of the expense England incurred to defend them. Not even past expenses but only forward looking expenses. The most onerous was the Stamp Act which attempted to cover ~10% of the cost. It was repealed. The Quartering Act was an attempt to have the colonies pay something minimal for the British troops and I think if you look at it in that context, read the Quartering Act, I don't think it was that out of line. But I'm trying to think in late 18th century terms rather than a 21st century mentality. Georgia initally refused to comply with the Quartering Act, the British response to that refusal was the "threat" of removing British troops. Georgia reconsidered and decided to comply. jttmab

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next