SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (143926)10/28/2005 3:18:54 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) of 793731
 
The report also said Wilson lied when he told The Washington Post he knew the Niger intelligence had been based on forged documents. The CIA didn't obtain the document said to be a forgery until a full eight months after Wilson's return from Niger.

This issue has been successfully clouded by the media (displaying their usual right-wing bias). In fact, the forged documents were around long before February 2002.

<<< ... The US, in turn, was basing most, though not all, of its suspicions on these reports it got from this unnamed foreign intelligence agency that provided an initial report to the US shortly after 9/11 and then another with more detail in February 2002, as the SSCI report states. That foreign government was Italy. And the information they provided also stemmed from the same documents ... >>>

talkingpointsmemo.com

What happened is that a group of nefarious Neocons created this bogus evidence that Saddam tried to buy Uranium from Niger, and then they spread the evidence around in various ways. In the end, a group of naive intelligence officials in various countries thought they were making independent conclusions on independent data points. In fact, it was all the same bogus report at the bottom of everything.

Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext