SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: geode0010/29/2005 9:17:26 PM
   of 281500
 
"...Libby learned about Wilson's wife from his boss, the vice president, before her identity had been made public, according to notes Libby took during the conversation and which were described to The New York Times by lawyers involved in the case.

It is not illegal for Libby and Cheney to discuss classified information; they both have security clearance. But the Libby-Cheney conversation contradicts reports of Libby's testimony, in which he is said to have stated that he first learned of Wilson's wife, and her employment, from reporters...."
seattletimes.nwsource.com

So how strange is this? Why was Libby lying about hearing it first from Cheney? Why did Cheney know about it in the first place? Why did Cheney lie about now knowing who Wilson was?

If Cheney-Libby discussing Plame is bizarre and suspicious but not illegal, then why did Libby lie and blame Tim Russert? Why Russert who is a rightwinger?

How bizarre and strange is this entire thing and how infinitely more important than a BJ by Monika. Yet the entire rightwing media establishment is trying to ignore a criminal indictment of the special advisor to the President AND the VP's chief of staff.

Why didn't Bush have the decency to fire Libby instead of letting him resign?

Why are Republicans always breaking the law?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext