SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (257723)11/1/2005 11:16:01 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1573711
 
Bottom line -- IMO, the disclosure shouldn't have happened, but I don't see that anything illegal occurred (and most competent, unbiased attorneys would suggest that even the perjury lacked the motivation that is required for it to be prosecuted (as existed in the Clinton case, for example)). And had the disclosure truly created a problem, Ms. Plame would have tried to minimize the damage, which clearly was not attempted.

For years, I have said lying about a BJ is nothing. You have come back and said that Clinton lied to a grand jury. Now ole Scooter lies to a grand jury.....forget the reason......and you say its nothing??? You're a partisan hypocrite.

The truth is disclosing Phlame's name was not the worst crime in the world but lying about that disclosure is a lot worse than lying about a BJ.

Furthermore, I suggest you wait before saying too much. There may be more to this than meets the eye.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News