Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (258038)	11/2/2005 12:44:52 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1573841

Al, if this was a court case, the circumstantial evidence that bush and his team "wagged the dog" would be overwhelming enough to convict them.... No it wouldn't, Al. Lots of CIA agents were convinced that Iraq did have WMD. Lots of Democrats as well were convinced of that notion. You're telling me that those CIA agents and the Democrats who believed them can also be convicted with "circumstantial evidence"? That's not true. The CIA told Bush that their info was questionable. Apparently, Clinton believed it from when he was president but those Dems who followed Bush did so because of the nonsense Bush fed them. Bottomline: we knew that 95% of Iraq's WMDs had been destroyed. Frix thought all of them had been destroyed but wasn't positive. That's why he wanted to go back in and look. As soon as he went in and before he could come to any conclusion, Bush upped the war drums. Why? Because he was afraid of what Frix would find; that is no WMDs, and Bush wanted to go to war against Iraq.........desperately. You need to ask yourself why. If Reid gets his way, I think the truth will finally come out!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next