Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 179.02

+3.7%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (48426)	11/4/2005 11:35:25 AM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) of 196488

it’s just a perception issue as no one disagrees that the Q is entitled to compensation from the chipset mfg (except apparently TXN) for their Essential IPR. How in the world is this a perception issue? It is pretty simple, if a handset manufacturer uses a Qualcomm chipset instead of an identically priced Broadcom chipset, they pay less royalties. BTW, TI acknowledges Q's IPR, they just have IPR of their own which Q decided was also essential. Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next