SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: trouthead who wrote (711115)11/4/2005 12:07:06 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
No digging necessary. This should be very simple to understand.

If Fitz or his investigators did not talk to Mitchell at all, he has two things which reflect poorly on him.

1. Not talking to one of the leading journalists on this matter, and someone who works directly for Russert, would seem to be a dereliction of duty for a prosecutor who spent 22 months investigating it.

2. Fitz's declaration that nobody in the media knew Plame's employment status would have been made on a false basis, lacking any foundation.

With regard to whether Mitchell lied...

1. If she lied to the TV interviewer in 2003, Fitz should have reconciled that seeming contradiction in the indictment or during his presser.

2. If she lied to his investigators, she should have been indicted just like Libby.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News