SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 170.90-1.3%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: carranza2 who wrote (48518)11/7/2005 5:48:53 PM
From: 100cfm  Read Replies (3) of 196561
 
Also interesting will be to be find out what patents Q is sueing for and how did NOK not get them included in their agreement. Even if the patents were filed after the agreement.Don't all of Q's agreements have a clause that automaticaly include any subsequent patents that arise during the term of the agreement. Could NOK been so stupid as to refuse to have them included in the agreement so as too try and minimize the royalty payment as much as possible by saying we don't need these patents so we want x% off the rate you charge us.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News