SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (44999)11/8/2005 8:21:01 AM
From: loantech  Read Replies (3) of 110194
 
Darfott I have another analogy. Maybe you can debunk it also. <g>

It may relate to what Ron Paul asked. In 1953 my dad was a shop foreman in Oregon. I figure he made about $400-500 a month on wages. The house we grew up in was $5,000.00. So less than 1 year gross wages. In 1973 I was making about $9600 a year(A foreman may have made $16,000) and a home cost about $24,000 on average so 1.5 times to 2.5 times a gross annual wage for 1 person.
In Oregon now an average home may be about $200,000 for around 1200 sq ft. Average wages for a family in Oregon are about $65,000.00 with both husband and wife working. So a home now costs over three times gross income and that is with both people working so 6 times what it did per person in 1953.

So the dollar has lost value or wages have not kept up with costs. So in a sense maybe Ron Paul is right, money does not go as far as it used to IMO.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext