Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 13.90

-3.4%

Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SiouxPal who wrote (47615)	11/8/2005 7:46:33 PM
From: ThirdEye	Read Replies (1) of 362247

Dear Mr. Dirtbag, This morning I heard statements from US army personnel to the effect that the destruction of Fallujah was deliberately delayed until after the election. Was that because the Republicans knew they were going to win? And they wanted to make sure that an invasion of Fallujah didn't diminish their chances? OR was it because they knew that after they won the election they could do anything they wanted in Fallujah and nobody could do anything about it? What if Bush had lost the election? Would there have been no invasion of Fallujah even though it was identified as an insurgent stronghold? Would Fallujah have been any less of an insrugent stronghold if Kerry had won? If you believe in your military strategy, your tactics and your military intelligence, why would an attack be postponed until after an election? Inquiring minds want to know.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next