Some democrats and principled republicans seem worried that President Bush might pardon Scooter Libby. I don't think that should be a worry. President Bush is a man of honor. If Libby is found guilty of a crime by a jury of his peers, an honorable man would recognize the process of law must be honored, even if he disagreed with its decision, and accept it. This is especiallly true of a conviction that occurs in his administration. Since President Bush is an honorable man, he cannot pardon a convicted Scooter Libby.
What would be dishonorable would be to pardon someone before the legal system can finish its process. George Bush would not do this. He would agree that as a nation of laws, we must let the legal system act for the good of the Country. Therefore, he cannot and will not pardon Scooter Libby before trial.
So, if President Bush, being an honorable man, could not pardon Scooter Libby if he is convicted, or before he is convicted, and there is no need for pardon if he is acquited or the charges dropped, why won't President George w. Bush simply now state that he will not pardon Mr. Libby? This would make it easier on Scott McClellan, who will have to face the question again and again. |
