SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Abgenix, Inc. (ABGX)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: John McCarthy11/10/2005 12:02:19 AM
  Read Replies (3) of 590
 
Merrill on abgx -

Caution - I cannot prove that Merrill really wrote this ....

from Yahoo board ....

11/09/2005

Highlights:

VALUATION GAP IS NOT JUSTIFIED:
ImClone is trading at a 127% premium and has a $1.5 B larger market cap than Abgenix. But, we believe the valuation gap is not justified because Abgenix is likely to have a significant marketing advantage for p-mab, gets better worldwide economics for its drug, and should get more pipeline value as well. Thus, we reiterate our BUY on ABGX and our SELL on IMCL (C-3-9; $32.20).

P-MAB MARKETING ADVANTAGE
Despite being 2nd- to-market, we believe panitumumab (p-mab) will have a significant marketing advantage vs. Erbitux,
allowing the drug to capture more than 50% of the colorectal cancer market. P-mab has a safety advantage because it is not associated with severe allergic reactions. P-mab is dosed every other week, which matches the every other week dosing of chemo used for colorectal cancer, vs. Erbitux’s once weekly dosing. Amgen is likely to bundle p-mab with other cancer products, driving share. And, positive results from a recent comparative study should provide an efficacy marketing edge for p-mab as well.

BETTER WORLDWIDE ECONOMICS
If ex-US sales are 2/3 that of the US then we estimate Abgenix’s worldwide royalty equivalent would be 30% versus
Imclone’s 25%. Abgenix splits US and ex-US p-mab profits with Amgen. In the US, assuming a 65% operating margin, the royalty equivalent is 32.5% vs. ImClone’s net royalty of 35%. Outside the US, which could be almost as large as the US, a 50% operating margin would translate into a royalty equivalent of 25% versus Imclone’s net 4.5% royalty.

PIPELINE VALUE FAVORS ABGX:
Neither company has a robust proprietary pipeline, but Abgenix will receive royalties on worldwide sales of multiple products that were developed based on Abgenix’s proprietary XenoMouse technology. We expect ABGX to receive a 5% royalty on future sales of Amgen’s Denosumab for osteoporosis, which could achieve sales of $3 B – $4 B annually.

FACTORS THAT FAVOR IMCLONE: Abgenix has a marketing advantage, gets better economics and should get more pipeline value. However, Imclone has more cash, greater incoming milestone payments, and is profitable. We estimate incremental value for ImClone of $685 MM, which still isn’t enough to explain the valuation discrepancy.

finance.messages.yahoo.com

regards,
John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext