SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Orcastraiter who wrote (69641)11/11/2005 11:05:14 AM
From: Dan B.Read Replies (1) of 81568
 
As I said, attacking sources NEVER works, and particularly when they aren't mine. U.N. inspections are the source for the presence of the fuselage, which only confirms the testimony from the defectors you decry. So far then, defectors 1, you zero. Then, your little article says "anti-terrorist" commandos were trained at salmon pak. There is nothing obviusly mutually exclusive between that and the defectors noting taht Saddams Fedheyeen guys trained there (or others).

All in all, not having seen any inconsistency in the testimony given, I'd say there is every reason to continue to question the presence of that fuselage in Iraq. Since the alleged fuselage existed as claimed, perhaps the Saudis training on it existed as claimed too. If you want to discredit this testimony, you'll need more that a link which manages to help corroborate a part of story told.

Dan B.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News