SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : IPO and Other Stock Plays

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: RikRichter11/12/2005 7:59:04 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 13331
 
Top 10 Nanotechnology Companies Likely To Go Public from Foresight.org

From the Sept/Oct issue of Nanotechnology Law & Business (subscription required), a piece titled “Top Ten Nanotechnology Companies Likely To Go Public.” In alphabetical order: Carbon Nanotechnologies, Insert Therapeutics, Konarka, Molecular Imprints, Nanodynamics, Nanofilm, Nanosys, Nano-Tex, Nantero, and Zyvex.

Excerpt:

“Zyvex unabashedly claims that it is ‘the most publicized nanotechnology business in the world.’ Founded in 1997, the company is primarily supported by investments from its founder and CEO, Jim Von Ehr. Zyvex also received a $25 million NIST award under the ATP program. The company maintains that its ultimate goal is development of a molecular assembler, a seemingly remote possibility at this time. Nevertheless, Zyvex has several early products. NanoSolve Materials product line enables customers to more effectively process carbon nanotubes for certain applications. Easton, for example, is using NanoSolve to integrate nanotubes into baseball bats. The company also sells a variety of tools for manipulation and testing of nanostructures. Perhaps most important to the prospect of an initial public offering, the company’s financial performance has continued to exceed expectations. In July 2005, the company had total revenue of $3.1 million — a 10% increase over plan and a 70% increase over the same period in 2004.”
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext