SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (69759)11/13/2005 3:21:41 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
Carter was not responsible for the fall of the Shah. True, he could have invaded Iran and stopped the takeover, but we were really poorly equipped to do that in those days, still licking our wounds from Vietnam and deeply in debt. The Soviets also stood in our way. They had interests in Iran.

The Shah's fall was in progress well before Carter came into power. In fact the middle east was ready to explode before Carter came in. It was about both oil money (Arab nations wanting a much bigger share of it) and Islamic fundamentalism.

I recommend you read the book THE PRIZE which is a history of the oil business. There you will see that the Shah was only holding onto power by brutally supressing his opponents, and was spending so much money on his own super lavish lifestyle that it was a grave insult to his own people. The Iranian situation is really tragic, but there is no one administration you can blame for it. Various blame can go to Nxon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, then later to GW Bush. But mainly it was the Shah's own fault.

GW's latest move in Iraq proved to doom the Iranian moderates. Now the country is back in the hands of far rightwing religious zealots. Just as bad as the Ayatollah.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext