Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 10.33

-0.2%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stockman_scott who wrote (48311)	11/13/2005 7:25:33 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) of 361203

I don't buy this because if you're going to use explosives to demolish a building, why bother with planes in the first place? You'd have to know that the planes wouldn't be intercepted or brought down by a fight with passengers and that would mean a conspiracy so widespread that someone would leak something somewhere. The weapon of choice in the first WTC attack was a truck bomb so it would seem reasonable to use larger bombs to bring down the structures the second go around. Why change the MO and then have to time the explosions with the plane hits? What if one plane hit and the other plane didn't? Why would anyone wish to cover up the existence of explosives in addition to the plane hits? If there's a widespread conspiracy with explosives, isn't it just as simple to coverup the source of those explosives as to cover up the existence of explosives?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next