SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation
DJT 10.60+2.7%Nov 24 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: geode00 who wrote (48593)11/14/2005 12:28:22 AM
From: James Calladine  Read Replies (2) of 361214
 
You are assuming that the Administration had no complicity in 9/11 for some of the reasons you gave.

You suggested that further evidence was needed. There is already
PLENTY OF EVIDENCE (at the very least) that the official story of the 9/11 Commission is false.

I gave you a reference to Griffin's book and am willing to suggest that if you read as much as 20-30 pages of it, you would be led to the conclusion of some complicity and if you read the whole book your viewpoint would change significantly.

I believe you would then feel that the CONSPIRACY THEORY was the one offered by the government.

On the other hand, it is understandable that we all have our opinions and we are often more wedded to them than any view that would cause a revision of them.

Namaste!

Jim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext