Mad Monk and Michal:
<<Paid Hypist>>=the name you call anyone whose views you wish to completely discount, otherwise known as a smear, plain and simple. If you were really familiar with the IAIC thread, you would know that Matt Kern is about as much a paid hypist for IAIC as you are for IMRS.
Isn't the harp on the Customs contract about as dead a horse as you could possibly beat? At least a year old, no? If you were looking for some way to give IAIC shareholders a reason to pause and reconsider, you were beaten to it by Hedgy1. I know that's disappointing to you not to be first, so you are reduced to smear and innuendo.
Michal-If your fairy tale was intended as a parable on Ken Parsons, you must have been fed some information by the Monk. If I am correct, it might interest you to know that I believe he originally got that information from me many months ago. I never posted it because it was too thin, pure supposition-no meat-and not likely to find any. But Monk is now posting snide references to this info on the IAIC thread as if he knows something no one else does. I challenge you, Monk, to tell the truth if you know it or to shut up if you don't. Otherwise you are only rumormongering. I am not hyping any stock or company now. I am talking about how information is being used on these threads.
MM, you called moonshot #1, you called moonshot #2, you called moonshot#3. You have posted with brilliance and freely shared information to the great benefit of many here. You are King of the Threads, the first Inductee in the Y2K Hall of Fame. But in this case, you are acting like an ass. |
