Re: "You're so hung up in circular drivel, that you haven't even addressed my points."
I've addressed your points too many times, so many times in fact, that I know you will mainly leave my comments lay as though they didn't exist, while falling back to repeat what's already been covered just as though I hadn't given you a hurdle to examine at all.
Your implication is that 150,000 Iraqi troops now fighting is not sufficient progress. The testimony from the general and rumsfeld was extensive in proclaiming that the evaluation process was refined, yet YOU don't acknowledge the plain words to that effect noted well. In your head, the testimony all could read, passed out the other ear as though the general never said it. We've been over that...and you ignore what was plainly said a thousand ways from sunday. 'Twasn't me, but the general indeed, who called it progress, yet you insist he claimed backwards progress. That's just pure refusal to look at what the man said on your part.
Who cares what you think of Nixon...there was both good and bad in him, and I was very upset with the man for his policies at the time, even without Watergate. Your "intensive purposes" (lol, you've botched that phrase, it's "intents and purposes," FYI) I've graciously acknowledged and accepted plainly, while informing you as the experts and my provided link shows, that the man never suffered from a vote in the House approving an Impeachment of him. You don't find me arguing he was innocent of anything, yet you ignorantly argue on the wrong side of the truth, and pretend I'm somehow defending the man from something you think is true (impeachment), which simply didn't happen.
You are like a brick wall I walk straight through, wholly unable to roll with the punches and be accepting and reasonable when it comes to the truth.
Dan B. |
