Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mistermj who wrote (175428)	11/20/2005 4:33:31 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) of 281500

And Murtha disagreed with the republican sponsored vote on Immediate withdrawal. It's being framed as Murtha's position, but it's not. What Murtha said, is lets put a time table to it with the goal of not withdrawing, but redeployment to Kuwait. Murtha would like it to be the goal over the next 6 months. A very wise move IMHO. The elections will have passed and it's time to let Iraqis sort out their differences with out the US involvement. Then if terrorists make trouble for the Iraqis, we're right there on the horizon. There is no mission accomplished with a well entrenched "insurgency" wanting you out. How many more boys do you want blown up with IED's? It's guerilla warfare and a lose lose situation that we shouldn't have been in in the first place. Everyone sees the republican maneuvering for what it is...a waste of time and taxpayer money. Orca

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next