SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ThirdEye who wrote (6213)9/14/1997 11:04:00 AM
From: Done, gone.   of 13949
 
taoman,

>> Michal-If your fairy tale was intended as a parable on Ken Parsons, you must have been fed some information by the Monk. If I am correct, it might interest you to know that I believe he originally got that information from me many months ago. I never posted it because it was too thin, pure supposition-no meat-and not likely to find any. But Monk is now posting snide references to this info on the IAIC thread as if he knows something no one else does. <<

My fairytale was a fairytale, case closed.

However, clarification of what you said, and what I quote above is in order.

1. I've NEVER communicated with MAD MONK except on SI threads, IN PUBLIC, period. No e-mails, no phone calls, no in person meetings, period. If I have been fed anything by MAD MONK, everyone else here at SI partook of the same meal, period.

2. Since you brought up Ken Parsons...
If I were you, I wouldn't be so quick to flatter myself with being the original source of what others know regarding Ken! My information on what Ken Parsons said comes from Ken Parsons' own post, which appeared on the IAIC SI thread over a year ago. This post remained visible for all of maybe ten minutes, then vanished. This post contained Ken's view of his former and present business associates. Since the post in question vanished, I will not try to retell what Ken said, but anyone that had the chance to read it (and you seem to be one of the fortunate ones) knows that it was not full of love and admiration for his former associates, and implied that his present ones are just peachy. Motive for public laundry washing? Beats me, but I have my ideas, which direct my investment decissions elswhere, period.

3. If you are speaking to me, when you mention rumormongering, may I inform you in the strongest terms possible, that I resent your insinuations?!! I have never, ever rumormongered, period! I challenge you to post a link to single instance of where I did so! If you cannot, I would very much appreciate a public appology! Period!

With mounting disrespect,

Bounced Czech
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext