SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (714417)11/21/2005 3:20:17 PM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
" I don't see where you are actually *disagreeing* with anything I've said"

My diatribe is mostly about the 3 or 4 requests to get you to answer the question. I think where we disagree most is that you seem to think it is legit what Fitzgerald is doing, and I think it is a collosal waste of time and tax payer money, and that the result of it will just be to unfairly tarnish President Bush. You seem to think there is value in indicting (and jailing and harrasing) people based on what can be deemed a non crime before there is even an investigation. Plame is not an operative. The real lesson of this whole episode to the public should be "wife gets anti-Bush hack job to discredit effort to remove Saddam" which is the truth, and which is what was circling around Washington at the time prior to his dihsonest and incorrect editorial in the NY Times.

But it is really about tarnishing Bush and our leadership, and unfortunately it is working. Maybe in 3 or 4 more years Fitzgerald can find another conflicting memory about an insignificant event that happened years ago and throw the Bastards who have differing recollections of the insignificant event in jail for 30 years. That would propel America to the forefront of justice, wouldn't it?

"I was. Totally"

Then you are forgetful, because you kept going back to the original question, and I had clarified it a couple of times.

"when you didn't 'like' my reply"

I actually agreed with your reply. But as I stated, I didn't ask the right question. Why is that so hard for you to believe? Have you ever typed out anything on this thread and not worded it incorrectly? Unfortunately I have quite a few times (I spit out my posts to quickly overall), but I correct the situation and move on. You can't seem to do that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News