SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (148529)11/24/2005 9:41:01 AM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) of 793600
 
I have this feeling of missing connections.

There exists a middle ground where you can understand the reasons given why something was done but not agree with them, where you aren't rabidly anti-war, just not in agreement with the conditions and timing of this one. Where the warnings and prophecies gave enough pause to not want to start something without more thought and preparation. There was no discussion-- and preemptive war deserved more thought, imo.

BOth sides have now morphed a great deal in what they say they expected or intended. Emphases have changed. There was a lot of innuendo and word choice imageries that influenced us before this war. It was an accumulated, almost subliminal persuading. Had everything worked out ideally, perhaps no one would be resentful of what they now perceive as manipulation. Dunno.

For me, the discussion of why and when, the WMDs, all the blamethrowing and defensive posturing should be put aside-- it has gotten so repetitive and ugly-- and the immediate problem of where we are heading dealt with more openly. Doubts and questions about our timeframe and resources are growing. Bush needs a comprehensible, convincing response to these questions to keep us from making (another, imo) too precipitous move.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext