SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (71023)11/27/2005 9:59:13 AM
From: TideGliderRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
You missed the point of the message. I am not arguing whether there was or wasn't WMD. I am simply stating a fact. I see it all the time. People being confused about lack of evidence and if something occurred.

It is arrogant to believe that there is always adequate evidence to be found. A proclamation of finding none or little evidence of something is not a definitive expression that it did not occur.

In considering your argument about WMD I think positive proclamation by Saddam was adequate. He made others believe.

This has simply become a political argument and being so many simply ignore the obvious.

As your noted paste contains the "seen no evidence" of this or that, it falls into the nondefinitive group. How in the world with all the operatives in Iraq could anyone be so arrogant to believe they know what each did or didn't do? It simply has yet been determined. I don't think very much of that commission as they did shuffle Able Danger under the carpet.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News