SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan B. who wrote (71022)11/27/2005 1:33:35 PM
From: OrcastraiterRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
No, if Bush believed as, for instance, I still do (which you can glean from the above), he by definition could not have lied. And for all the intelligence reports, he and I may well be correct about Saddam having a role and foreknowledge of 9/11.


It's only you who thinks that Saddam had a hand in 9-11. Bush is on the record saying that there is no connection there. He did however state:

"We have removed an ally of Al Qaeda."

This is a statement that needs proof positive, otherwise it's a lie. Especially in the context of going to war.

Intelligence reports delivered to Bush weeks after 9-11 said there were no alliances between Saddam and Al Qaeda. Therefore the CIA disagrees with Bush.

The 9-11 Commission said:

"But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States."

Bush either lied, or he's delusional. Either way he needs to be impeached.

Orca
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext