SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold City Mining - John Chapman, President

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dan wynne who wrote (1)9/14/1997 7:46:00 PM
From: Francis R. Biscan Jr.   of 15
 
>>if i may be so upfront, what is your relationship to the company and directors/insiders ?<<

I am not an employee of the company or related to any of the management of Gold City or any of it's directors. BTW, asking direct questions is a must for the internet and even then we do not know who we are talking with, so right from the beginning, I will caution everyone to verify everything I say, and do their own DD and subsequent uncovering of the facts. We will all learn together.

I will say that in the few weeks that I have been exploring GCP, I have discovered that they currently do not have a web site. I will be approaching them on setting one up and if they do that through me, I will disclose it.

>>it is unclear to me what GCPs ownership of the Old Nick is... currently 100%, possibly diluted to only 3 % NSR ?<<

Gold City owns 100% of the property. They have optioned up to 70% of it to AMT and Monument Mining Corporation, in stages. I know that they have earned 5% so far and if they spend 750,000 in 1997, they will earn another 10%. I am not sure if they have spent anything this year, as the financing they had arranged earlier in the year fell through do to the Bre-X effect. It is possible that we will regain 65% if AMT does not raise the necessary funds.

Of the remaining 30% that GCP retained, they have optioned off 15% of it to two other companies, subject to a 3 %, dropping to a 1% net smelter royalty. I am not sure if these two companies have already earned their interest, but I will check.

Bottom line is, at this present date, the least that Gold City could end up with in the Old Nick project is 15% with a 3% net smelter royalty on another 15%. After 10 million Canadian has been reached, it drops to 1%. This equates to about about $0.69 a share FD, without dilution considerations for mine development. If I remember correctly, management believes that 75% of the capital costs of an estimated 124 million Canadian, will be bankable, leaving the rest to equity. Of the remaining portion, GCP would be liable for 15% or C$4,650,000.00. Upon the completion of a full feasibility, I would expect we should be much higher then we are now. If we financed at C$1.00, we would add another 9.3 million shares FD. ( assuming a full warrant ) Even if we ended up with 25 million shares, GCP would earn C$0.36 a share.

Rich
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext