SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan B. who wrote (262402)11/28/2005 6:04:53 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1574005
 
Dude, if you can't acknowledge the nature of the USSC's 7-2 decision in this matter, yet call ME confused...you are just a lying lout, IMHO, and a worthless conversationalist who won't confront the facts. I've confronted the 5-4 decision concerning in large part the time constraints you are so hung up on. The fact that you cannot confront the 7-2 part of the decision is a strong indication as to just who is confused here.

I repeat..........the gist of the 7/2 ruling had to do with Gore's requesting a recount........I reponded by discussing that case and suggesting that it was not an issue of constitutionality but rather timing and methodology. In response, you said I was misunderstanding the point and then referenced the court's 5/4 vote. That vote placed a stay on the FLA Supreme CT's mandate to continue the recount and had nothing to do with constitutionality........at least not with the affirming vote.

So what do you want to talk about? If we are talking about the first case where the vote was 7/2, then lets talk about the first case. You keep jumping back and forth as if the two cases were interchangeable. They are not.

My point, and I believe CJ agrees, is that Gore's request for a recount was not unconstitutional; rather the problem was that it ran counter to the requirements of certain FLA laws, mostly in terms of timing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News