| |
Mad Monk and Michal:
Jeez, I guess I got your attention.
MM: I agree with you that there may be much for shareholders of this fabled company to ponder. Much of it is, however, not news. You may well be able to post a fact per day on that thread, and I'll bet I could post those very ones myself. Believe me, anyone paying attention to that company could hardly avoid having these matters in mind. That is why I thought it so uncool to suggest in a post, not actually articulate, something new. Posting innuendo merely allows readers to make up their own stories of what it all means. This serves no one.
I have held some shares since before the first split and still hold some, shakily. I must examine whether I am married to this stock, and I am suggesting that you not bash carelessly.
If the company was really behind your bust, it was a cowardly act of small minded men who have something to hide. As I said to you already, if everyone using the term "SCAM" was barred from SI, the ZITL thread would be deathly quiet. But again, I haven't heard from anyone who claims to know for sure how it happened. I find it interesting, though, that hedgy1 was also reinstated but we have not heard from him.
Michal: I never meant to suggest that you were rumormongering. The reference was to a specific post by MM on the IAIC thread. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I am not aware of the post by KP you referred to on the IAIC thread long ago. He must have been more specific in that post than the one I saw on the CSGI thread, which also disappeared quickly. I have always been curious about the meaning of these posts. The most I can make of it was that whatever CSGI was in a previous incarnation stiffed KP for money. What it all means beyond that is a mystery to me.
I still find it very odd, incongruous and inappropriate that this mystery, thinly detailed by even second or third hand information, in the face of all else so much more current and easily documented, should surface as if it has significance.
So, OK, it was my turn to "shoot from the lip." No harm was ever intended. |
|
