SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (176645)12/1/2005 1:24:52 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Hawkmoon, now you're resorting to personal attacks because you've lost all of your arguments. READ, COMPREHEND, THINK and then post.

I have no problem if Ted Koppel reads the names of everyone killed on 9/11. Do you have a problem if he reads the names of all Iraqis killed during this inane war?

I've given you the answer to the force limitation. You're making an inane argument because you've lost the debate.

Rumsfeld and Chalabi both publicly say they weren't for invasion. Chalabi, the Bushies hand picked Saddam replacement, says he was for the CLINTON ILA, not invasion.

You've lost. Your side has lost. When things are done for the wrong reasons and based on a PACK OF LIES, it's only a matter of time before even the rats turn against it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News