rrm....my responses in bold below
To: the_worm06 who wrote (292) 12/4/2005 4:11:09 AM
From: rrm_bcnu of 309
worm
"1. The bankruptcy documents filed in the court called for common shares from both James Turek and from PLNI to be issued to the creditors."
That is a lie.. Prove it!
Which one is a lie?...that the shares transfered to the Creditors are from Turek, PLNI or both?....
"rrm states that restricted shares are not common shares. He is making absolutely false statements."
Another lie. All they have to is read what I wrote just below your lie
you are saying that restricted shares are not common shares. I say that your are making false statements here. You can have restricted common stock and you can also have freely trading common stock that has been registered with the SEC. Just because stock is restricted does not mean that it is not common stock as you are falsely stating here.
"Regarding the transfer of common shares by Turek to the Creditors, these were specifically stated to be freely trading shares that can be sold into the market, thereby putting downward pressure into the market.
"
Another lie they were already part of the O/S and thus put no downward pressure on the market.
You can have both restricted and freely trading shares that are part of the Outstanding common shares. If Turek transfers his freely trading shares to the Creditors, who then sell these freely trading shares into the market in order to raise cash, as was specifically mentioned in the court documents, then you are going to have downward pressure on the stock.
"4. Again, it is obvious that rrm has not done his proper due diligence on PLNI by showing a total lack of knowledge of the important terms of the court documents in the bankruptcies that would affect all PLNI stockholders...."
Wrong again worm..
No, I am not wrong. It is now even more painfully obvious that you have not done your proper due diligence on PLNI by showing a total lack of knowledge of the important terms of the court documents in the bankruptcies that would affect all PLNI stockholders AND by your total incompetence regarding any simple accounting and finance issues.
By the way, how are those reliable sources of yours that told you that the Telcoblue 10-Q-NT that was recently filed with the SEC included wording regarding operating income of $20-$24 million because of the SEMCO/ProMold deals, when, in reality Telcoblue fraudulently copied the exact wording from another company filed with the SEC only a few hours earlier?
rrm...as I told you before, you are way out of your league here.....
You have so few posters here that you have to spam this board with traffic from RB and then lie about it.
You are very transparent to even the newest investor.
You probably voted for Kerry too didnt you you worm! |
